<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feedback &amp; Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roofray.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/feedback-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roofray.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/feedback-features/</link>
	<description>Updates, Comments, and Stuff from the Founder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bird</title>
		<link>http://roofray.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/feedback-features/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roofray.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-7</guid>
		<description>For my site, the cost before rebates, etc was almost $9 per installed watt. It would be interesting to see how much of that is cost of the actual array, cost of other items, and labor. 

The main reason is that several companies are making announcements about having installed array costs drop to close to $1 - $2 per watt within just a few years, if you can believe them. 

Anyway, it would be interesting to see the sensitivity to actual array costs in the total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my site, the cost before rebates, etc was almost $9 per installed watt. It would be interesting to see how much of that is cost of the actual array, cost of other items, and labor. </p>
<p>The main reason is that several companies are making announcements about having installed array costs drop to close to $1 &#8211; $2 per watt within just a few years, if you can believe them. </p>
<p>Anyway, it would be interesting to see the sensitivity to actual array costs in the total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofray</title>
		<link>http://roofray.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/feedback-features/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>roofray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roofray.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Yes we have.  It wasn&#039;t an exhaustive comparison and some of it depends on the discounts a solar installer is offering of course, but on average we were right in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we have.  It wasn&#8217;t an exhaustive comparison and some of it depends on the discounts a solar installer is offering of course, but on average we were right in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greensolutions</title>
		<link>http://roofray.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/feedback-features/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>greensolutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roofray.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>This site is a great idea.  Thanks for your effort.  Have you done some drawings over existing systems to see how their energy output and financials compare to your calculations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is a great idea.  Thanks for your effort.  Have you done some drawings over existing systems to see how their energy output and financials compare to your calculations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
